TAJ MAHAL - THE TRUE STORY

TAJ MAHAL - THE TRUE STORY
TAJ MAHAL - THE TRUE STORY

Wednesday, August 25, 2010

THE SIGNIFICANT EVIDENCE


The term Taj Mahal itself never occurs in any Mogul court paper or chronicle even in Aurangzeb's time.

The term Taj Mahal is a corrupt form of the Sanskrit term “Tejo Mahalaya” signifying a Shiva Temple. Agreshwar Mahadev i.e. the Lord God of Agra was consecrated in it.

There are persons who have been connected with the repairs to and the maintenance of the Taj who have seen the ancient Shiva Linga and other Hindu idols sealed in the thick walls in chambers in the secret, sealed red-stone

storeyes below the marble basement. The Archaeological Survey of India is keeping discreetly, politically and diplomatically silent about it to the point of dereliction of its own duty to probe into hidden historical evidence.

The four marble pillars at the plinth corners are of the Hindu style. They are used as lamp-towers during the night and watch towers during the day. Such towers serve to demarcate the holy precincts. Hindu wedding altars and the altars set up for God Satyanarayan worship have pillars raised at their four corners.

Evidence by Peter Mundy

Peter Mundy, an English traveler was in India from 1628 to 1633. His diary is now published under the title ‘Travels in Europe and Asia, 1608-1667. Without mentioning anything about the death of Mumtaz and Shah Jahan’s mourning in his diary he observes “There is already about her tomb a rail of gold. The building is begun and goes on with excessive labour and cost, prosecuted with extraordinary diligence, gold and silver esteemed common metal and marble but as ordinary stones..."

Although this is a very significant passage it is highly misleading while analyzing the above passage it should be noted that Mundy was in India only until 1633. If Mumtaz’s date of death is accepted as 17th Zil il quada 1040 A.H., i.e. 20th, June 1631, A.D. at Burhanpur construction of the Taj could have started only after Shah Jahan’s arrival at Agra which was after June 1632. That is to say that Peter Mundy was in India only for a year after Mumtaz’s death so short a period should be insufficient even to dig the foundation of the vast building complex.

Carbon 14 Test

A wooden piece from the riverside eastern doorway of the Taj subjected to the Carbon-14 test by an American laboratory, has revealed the door to be 300 years older than Sahajahan.

The Carbon-14 test is applicable to anything which has been part of a living organism such as a piece of bone or timber.

A living tree continues to breathe-in carbon dioxide while alive. But once it is dead the breathing-in stops and dead and the dead piece continues to lose its carbon dioxide (including C14) content at a known rate.

Trident


The Taj Mahal has a Trident pinnacle over the dome. A full scale figure of the Trident is inlaid in the red stone courtyarda to the right of the Taj Mahal as we stand facing the marble edifice. The central shaft of the trident depicts a kalash (scared pot) holding bent mango leaves and a coconut. All these are used by the Hindus for worshiping and regarded as very auspicious.

Tridents are also depicted against a red lotus background at the apex of the marble arched entrances on all sides of the Taj.

Our conditioned minds and blurred visions mistakenly believed for three centuries that the pinnacle (A trident see picture) depicts an Islamic crescent and star.





Above Mumtaz's cenotaph hangs a chain by which now hangs a lamp. Before capture by Shahjahan the chain used to hold a gold water pitcher from which water used to drip on the Shiva Linga.


Between the so-called mosque and the drum house is a multi-storeyed octagonal well with a flight of stairs reaching down to the water level. This is the traditional treasury well in Hindu temple-palaces. Treasure chests used to be kept in the lower apartments while treasury personnel had their offices in the upper chambers. The circular stairs made it difficult for the intruders to reach down to the treasure or to escape with it undetected or unpursued. In case the premises had to be surrendered to a besieging enemy the treasure could be pushed into the well to remain hidden from the conqueror and remain safe for salvaging if the place was reconquered. Such an elaborate multistoryed well is superfluous for a mere mausoleum.

Has Shahajahan really built the Taj Mahal as a wonder mausoleum, history would have recorded a specific date on which she was ceremoniously buried in the Taj Mahal. No such date is ever mentioned. This important missing detail decisively exposes the falsity of the Shahjahan legend.

Even the year of Mumtaz's death is unknown. It is variously speculated to be 1629, 1630, 1631, or 1632. Had she deserved a fabulous burial, as is claimed, the date of her death would not have been a matter of speculation. In a harem teeming with 5000 women it was difficult to keep track of dates of death. Apparently the date of Mumtaz's death was so insignificant an event as not to merit any special notice. Who would then build a Taj Mahal for her burial?


Descriptions of the garden plants around the Taj of Shahjahan's time mention Ketaki, Jai, Jui, champa, Maulashree, Harshringar and Bel. All these are plants whose flowers or leaves are used in the worship of the Vedic deities. Bel leaves are used exclusively in Shiv worship. A graveyard is planted only with shady trees because the idea of using fruit or flower from plants in a cemetery is abhorrent to human conscience. The presence of Bel and other flower plants in the Taj garden is proof of its having been a Shiva temple before seizure by Shahjahan.

Prophet Mohammad has ordained that the burial spot of a Muslim should be inconspicuous and must not be marked by even a single tombstone. In flagrant violation of this the Taj Mahal has one grave in the basement and another in the first floor chamber both ascribed to Mumtaz. Those two cenotaphs were infact erected to bury the two-tire Shiv Lingas that were consecrated in the Taj Mahal. It is customary for the hindus to install two Shiv Lingas one over the other in two storeyes as may be seen in the Mahakaleshwas temple in Ujjain and Somnath temple raised by Ahilyabai in Somnath Pattan. Even the basement cenotaph is a fake because it is two storeyes above the river bank ground level.

The Taj Mahal has a reverberating dome. Such a dome is an absurdity for a tomb which must ensure peace and silence. Contrarily reverberating domes are a necessity in Hindu temples because they create an ecstatic din multiplying and magnifying the sound of bells, drums and pipes accompanying the worship of Hindu deities.


What better proof is need of the temple origin of the Taj Mahal? It's walls and sealed chambers still hide the Hindu idols that were consecrated in it before Shahjanhan's seizure of the Taj Mahal.

Had the Taj been built to specially to bury Mumtaz in, it should not have been cluttered with graves. But the Taj premises contain numerous other graves at least in its eastern and southern pavilions, to desecrate the entire temple complex.

Tavernier, the French traveler has noted that Shahjahan couldn't obtain timber for raising a scaffolding (to inscribe the Koran at various heights). Shahjahan had, therefore to raise a scaffolding of brick. As a result the “cost of the scaffolding was more than that of the entire work” says Tavernier. This is clear proof that Shahjahan did not build the Taj but only inscribed the Koran, and sealed hundreds of rooms, staircases and ventilators.

At the southeast corner of the Taj garden is an ancient royal cattle house. Cows attached to the Tejo Mahalaya temple used to be reared there. A cowshed is an incongruity in an Islamic tomb.

The entire Taj complex comprises 400 to 500rooms. Residential accommodation on such a stupendous scale is unthinkable in a mausoleum.

Book titled THE TAJMAHAL IS A TEMPLE PALACE (hardcover, deluxe edition comprising 360 pages, 86 photos and two Persian documents of Shahjahan's court price Rs. 250/-) gives all the evidence.

एक हिंदू प्राचीन शिव मन्दिर है


प्रो.पी. एन. ओक. को छोड़ कर किसी ने कभी भी इस कथन को चुनौती नही दी कि........

"ताजमहल शाहजहाँ ने बनवाया था"

प्रो.ओक. अपनी पुस्तक "TAJ MAHAL - THE TRUE STORY" द्वारा इस
बात में विश्वास रखते हैं कि,--

सारा विश्व इस धोखे में है कि खूबसूरत इमारत ताजमहल को मुग़ल बादशाह शाहजहाँ ने बनवाया था.....


ओक कहते हैं कि......

ताजमहल प्रारम्भ से ही बेगम मुमताज का मकबरा न होकर,एक हिंदू प्राचीन शिव मन्दिर है जिसे तब तेजो महालय कहा जाता था.



अपने अनुसंधान के दौरान ओक ने खोजा कि इस शिव मन्दिर को शाहजहाँ ने जयपुर के महाराज जयसिंह से अवैध तरीके से छीन लिया था और इस पर अपना कब्ज़ा कर लिया था,,
=>
शाहजहाँ के दरबारी लेखक "मुल्ला अब्दुल हमीद लाहौरी "ने अपने "बादशाहनामा" में मुग़ल शासक बादशाह का सम्पूर्ण वृतांत 1000 से ज़्यादा पृष्ठों मे लिखा है,,जिसके खंड एक के पृष्ठ 402 और 403 पर इस बात का उल्लेख है कि, शाहजहाँ की बेगम मुमताज-उल-ज़मानी जिसे मृत्यु के बाद, बुरहानपुर मध्य प्रदेश में अस्थाई तौर पर दफना दिया गया था और इसके ०६ माह बाद,तारीख़ 15 ज़मदी-उल- अउवल दिन शुक्रवार,को अकबराबाद आगरा लाया गया फ़िर उसे महाराजा जयसिंह से लिए गए,आगरा में स्थित एक असाधारण रूप से सुंदर और शानदार भवन (इमारते आलीशान) मे पुनः दफनाया गया,लाहौरी के अनुसार राजा जयसिंह अपने पुरखों कि इस आली मंजिल से बेहद प्यार करते थे ,पर बादशाह के दबाव मे वह इसे देने के लिए तैयार हो गए थे.

इस बात कि पुष्टि के लिए यहाँ ये बताना अत्यन्त आवश्यक है कि जयपुर के पूर्व महाराज के गुप्त संग्रह में वे दोनो आदेश अभी तक रक्खे हुए हैं जो शाहजहाँ द्वारा ताज भवन समर्पित करने के लिए राजा
जयसिंह को दिए गए थे.......

=>
यह सभी जानते हैं कि मुस्लिम शासकों के समय प्रायः मृत दरबारियों और राजघरानों के लोगों को दफनाने के लिए, छीनकर कब्जे में लिए गए मंदिरों और भवनों का प्रयोग किया जाता था ,
उदाहरनार्थ हुमायूँ, अकबर, एतमाउददौला और सफदर जंग ऐसे ही भवनों मे दफनाये गए हैं ....

=>
प्रो. ओक कि खोज ताजमहल के नाम से प्रारम्भ होती है---------

="
महल" शब्द, अफगानिस्तान से लेकर अल्जीरिया तक किसी भी मुस्लिम देश में
भवनों के लिए प्रयोग नही किया जाता...
यहाँ यह व्याख्या करना कि महल शब्द मुमताज महल से लिया गया है......वह कम से कम दो प्रकार से तर्कहीन है---------

पहला -----शाहजहाँ कि पत्नी का नाम मुमताज महल कभी नही था,,,बल्कि उसका नाम मुमताज-उल-ज़मानी था ...


और दूसरा-----किसी भवन का नामकरण किसी महिला के नाम के आधार पर रखने के लिए केवल अन्तिम आधे भाग (ताज)का ही प्रयोग किया जाए और प्रथम अर्ध भाग (मुम) को छोड़ दिया जाए,,,यह समझ से परे है...

प्रो.ओक दावा करते हैं कि,ताजमहल नाम तेजो महालय (भगवान शिव का महल) का बिगड़ा हुआ संस्करण है, साथ ही साथ ओक कहते हैं कि----
मुमताज और शाहजहाँ कि प्रेम कहानी,चापलूस इतिहासकारों की भयंकर भूल और लापरवाह पुरातत्वविदों की सफ़ाई से स्वयं गढ़ी गई कोरी अफवाह मात्र है क्योंकि शाहजहाँ के समय का कम से कम एक शासकीय अभिलेख इस प्रेम कहानी की पुष्टि नही करता है.....



इसके अतिरिक्त बहुत से प्रमाण ओक के कथन का प्रत्यक्षतः समर्थन कर रहे हैं......
तेजो महालय (ताजमहल) मुग़ल बादशाह के युग से पहले बना था और यह भगवान् शिव को समर्पित था तथा आगरा के राजपूतों द्वारा पूजा जाता था-----

==>
न्यूयार्क के पुरातत्वविद प्रो. मर्विन मिलर ने ताज के यमुना की तरफ़ के दरवाजे की लकड़ी की कार्बन डेटिंग के आधार पर 1985 में यह सिद्ध किया कि यह दरवाजा सन् 1359 के आसपास अर्थात् शाहजहाँ के काल से लगभग 300 वर्ष पुराना है...


==>
मुमताज कि मृत्यु जिस वर्ष (1631) में हुई थी उसी वर्ष के अंग्रेज भ्रमण कर्ता पीटर मुंडी का लेख भी इसका समर्थन करता है कि ताजमहल मुग़ल बादशाह के पहले का एक अति महत्वपूर्ण भवन था......


==>
यूरोपियन यात्री जॉन अल्बर्ट मैनडेल्स्लो ने सन् 1638 (मुमताज कि मृत्यु के 07 साल बाद) में आगरा भ्रमण किया और इस शहर के सम्पूर्ण जीवन वृत्तांत का वर्णन किया,,परन्तु उसने ताज के बनने का कोई भी सन्दर्भ नही प्रस्तुत किया,जबकि भ्रांतियों मे यह कहा जाता है कि ताज का निर्माण कार्य 1631 से 1651 तक जोर शोर से चल रहा था......


==>
फ्रांसीसी यात्री फविक्स बर्निअर एम.डी. जो औरंगजेब द्वारा गद्दीनशीन होने के समय भारत आया था और लगभग दस साल यहाँ रहा,के लिखित विवरण से पता चलता है कि,औरंगजेब के शासन के समय यह झूठ फैलाया जाना शुरू किया गया कि ताजमहल शाहजहाँ ने बनवाया था.......


प्रो. ओक. बहुत सी आकृतियों और शिल्प सम्बन्धी असंगताओं को इंगित करते हैं जो इस विश्वास का समर्थन करते हैं कि,ताजमहल विशाल मकबरा न होकर विशेषतः हिंदू शिव मन्दिर है.......


आज भी ताजमहल के बहुत से कमरे शाहजहाँ के काल से बंद पड़े हैं,जो आम जनता की पहुँच से परे हैं

प्रो. ओक., जोर देकर कहते हैं कि हिंदू मंदिरों में ही पूजा एवं धार्मिक संस्कारों के लिए भगवान् शिव की मूर्ति,त्रिशूल,कलश और ॐ आदि वस्तुएं प्रयोग की जाती हैं.......


==>
ताज महल के सम्बन्ध में यह आम किवदंत्ती प्रचलित है कि ताजमहल के अन्दर मुमताज की कब्र पर सदैव बूँद बूँद कर पानी टपकता रहता है,, यदि यह सत्य है तो पूरे विश्व मे किसी किभी कब्र पर बूँद बूँद कर पानी नही टपकाया जाता,जबकि प्रत्येक हिंदू शिव मन्दिर में ही शिवलिंग पर बूँद बूँद कर पानी टपकाने की व्यवस्था की जाती है,फ़िर ताजमहल (मकबरे) में बूँद बूँद कर पानी टपकाने का क्या मतलब....????



राजनीतिक भर्त्सना के डर से इंदिरा सरकार ने ओक की सभी पुस्तकें स्टोर्स से वापस ले लीं थीं और इन पुस्तकों के प्रथम संस्करण को छापने वाले संपादकों को भयंकर परिणाम भुगत लेने की धमकियां भी दी गईं थीं....


प्रो. पी. एन. ओक के अनुसंधान को ग़लत या सिद्ध करने का केवल एक ही रास्ता है कि वर्तमान केन्द्र सरकार बंद कमरों को संयुक्त राष्ट्र के पर्यवेक्षण में खुलवाए, और अंतर्राष्ट्रीय विशेषज्ञों को छानबीन करने दे ....

ज़रा सोचिये....!!!!!!
कि यदि ओक का अनुसंधान पूर्णतयः सत्य है तो किसी देशी राजा के बनवाए गए संगमरमरी आकर्षण वाले खूबसूरत,शानदार एवं विश्व के महान आश्चर्यों में से एक भवन, "तेजो महालय" को बनवाने का श्रेय बाहर से आए मुग़ल बादशाह शाहजहाँ को क्यों......?????

तथा......

इससे जुड़ी तमाम यादों का सम्बन्ध मुमताज-उल-ज़मानी से क्यों........???? ???


ABOUT TAJ MAHAL

Emperor Shah Jahan’s wife Arjumand Banu died in Burhanpur on 17th Zil-il-quada 1040 A.D. (i.e. 20th June, 1631 AD) soon after her last delivery. During 18 years of her married life she bore 14 children of whom seven survived) her body was buried in a garden in Burhanpur but is said to have been exhumed after about six months and transported to Agra on 15th Jamal-ul-Sanye 1041 A. H. i.e. 8th January 1632 A.D. according to ASI.

Now the question arises as to why would he disturb and remove a body well laid to rest and have it carried to Agra 600 miles away? Why could he not raise a monument in her memory where she was already buried? And if the Taj took years to build according to tradition why was the body carried to Agra within six months of the death what was the hurry?

To find an answer to this we must go, through the documents of Shah Jahan’s time.

J. B. Tavernier a French Merchant who visited India in the 17th century has noted in his book ‘Travels in India’ (originally in French). His travel account is mainly devoted to commerce. He was in India sometime between 1641 and 1668 Mumtaz had died sometime between 1629 and 1632 Tavernier arrived in India nearly 11 year after Mumtaz’s demise.

This is what Tavernier has recorded “Of all the tombs which sees at Agra that of the wife of Shah Jahan is the most splendid. He purposely made it near the Tasimacan where all foreigners come, so that the whole world should see and admire".

The word Tasimacan is Taz-i-Makan i.e. royal residence which is synonymus with Taj Mahal Shah Jahan’s object in burying Mumtaz there was precisely to cash in on the sculptural grandeur of that place. This clearly implies that at the time of burial Taj M-i-makan existed and was already a centre of tourist attraction.


The Badshahnama

Mulla Abdul Hamid Lahori was a courtier who wrote the Badshanama as an official chronicle at emperor Shah Jahan’s own command (in Persian). The Badshahnama by Abdul Hamid Lahori is a history of the first twenty years of the reign of Shah Jahan. (The Persian texts in its original form is published by the Asiatic society of Bengal in two volumes in Bibliotheca Indica series / on page 403 of vol I of that Badshahnama Abdul Hamid Lahori records that the body of Mumtaz was removed from Burhanpur and a grand mansion of unique splendor capped with a dome (‘Immar-E-Alishan wa Gumbaze’) taken from the Jaipur Maharja Jaising (Pesh Azeim Manzil-e-Rajah Mansing Bood wadaree waqt ba Raja Jaising) for the burial of Arjumand Banu Begum, alias Mumtaz ul Zamani (not Mumtaz Mahal as encyclopedia Britannica mentions) and that the building was then known as Raja Mansing's Palace. In exchange of that (Ali Manzil) grand palace, he (Jaisingh) was granted a piece of government land. After the arrival of the dead body in that-great city (Agra) on 15th Jama due Saniya next year that illustrious body of the heavenly queen was laid to rest. The officials of the capital according to royal orders of the day under the sky high lofty mausoleum hid (the body of) that pious lady from the eyes of the world, and this palace (Imarat-e-Alishan) so majestic and capped with a dome so lofty that in its stature (it) is a memorial to the courage of sky dimension of Sahib Qarani SANI (the king) and in strength so mighty. In his resolution so firms the foundation was laid and geometricians with forsight and architects of talent incurred an expenditure of Rs. 40 lakhs on this building.

‘Badshanama’ clearly asserts that Jaising was given land in exchange of Mansingh’s garden palace. But unfortunately we have historians and scholars who interpret the above document and say that… A spacious tract of land, south of Agra city, was chosen for the burial place and purchased from its owner Raja Jaisingh the grandson of Mansingh.

The plague displayed by ASI (archaeological survey of India) does not quote any authority for its claim moreover when Shaha Jahan himself does not claim the authorship of the Taj why should anybody else want to do so?

Numerous historians have therefore assumed baselessly that Shah Jahan obtained on open plot of land in exchange for another. Why should Shah Jahan exchange one plot of land for another it would be justifiable if the plot or land (where Mumtaz lay buried) in Burhanpur was exchanged for another. If he really did so was why would he not mention the location of the plot given to Jaising more over the Badshahnama clearly asserts that it was Jaising who was given land while Shah Jahan got Mansing's garden palace in exchange.

One of the above passages says that emperor engaged geometricians and architects for the project. Geometricians and architects were needed to plan the digging of the grave in the center of the basement chamber and raise a cenotaph exactly over it in the centre of the octagonal throne room on the ground floor and in the basement of the commandeered grand edifies. They were also needed to guide the removal of some marble stones, have Koranic extracts engraved on them in lettering of various sizes, (depending on the height at which they were to be fixed) and to put them in position.

The statement foundation was laid in line 40 is also self explanatory. Since a corpse in always interred in a pit filling up the ditch over the body is “laying the foundation of the grave”.

About the sum of four million rupees (Rs. 40 lakhs) that the Badshahnama tells us was expended on the building the explanation is simple the amount could be spent on digging and filling up grave in the basement, raising a cenotaph in the ground floor central octagonal chamber, covering them with costly mosaic of stones to match and merge with the palace flooring , barricading hundreds of rooms, ventilators, staircases, balconies, doorways and corridors in the seven storied marble palace and engraving the Koran along the frames of the four entrances to the edifice. The engraving necessitated raising a huge scaffolding to the towering height of the seven storied edifice around its massive girth and its many lofty gateways and arches. Such mosaic flooring and Koranic engravings also necessitated the removal of the stone-pitching of the existing palace at places and replacing it. Now stones had also to be ordered to replace those chipped off or broke in this tampering and tinkering. Hiring of highly paid artisans, ordering of stone from great distances and raising of a costly scaffolding accounts for the expenditure mentioned by Badshanama we wonder on what authority later writers have placed the cost of the so called construction of the Taj Mahal at any where up to Rs. 90 17 million, 9 crores and 17 lakhs when Shah Jahan own court chronicler Mullah Abdul Hamid Lahori places it at only 40 lakhs (4 million Rs.)

It is sometimes argued that it is quite possible that Shah Jahan built the Taj Mahal after demolishing Raja Mansingh’s palace. But why should Shah Jahan do that when he possessed vast lands of his own? And after demolishing why should he built it in accordance with Hindus architecture and not inscribe anywhere in the whole building complex that he (Shah Jahan) built it in the memory of Mumtaz his beloved wife?

The answer is obvious all the evidence only points to the fact that Shah Jahan occupied Raja Mansingh’s Palace and converted it with minor superficial changes like inscribing the Koran and build the cenotaphs to give it a resemblance of a tomb. In the process he also looted the precious stones and metals, sealed several rooms and removed as many original Hindu idols, motifs and inscriptions as he easily could.